From 321e40f0f429b0445a832230d30f100212d506ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rosalyn Kohler Date: Fri, 2 May 2025 08:01:44 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Add 'How Harmful Will Michael Gove Be At The Ministry Of Justice?' --- ...rmful-Will-Michael-Gove-Be-At-The-Ministry-Of-Justice%3F.md | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) create mode 100644 How-Harmful-Will-Michael-Gove-Be-At-The-Ministry-Of-Justice%3F.md diff --git a/How-Harmful-Will-Michael-Gove-Be-At-The-Ministry-Of-Justice%3F.md b/How-Harmful-Will-Michael-Gove-Be-At-The-Ministry-Of-Justice%3F.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d84b8f3 --- /dev/null +++ b/How-Harmful-Will-Michael-Gove-Be-At-The-Ministry-Of-Justice%3F.md @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +Extra worrying still is the conceptual indeterminacy surrounding the premise for a person proper to vote and restrictions on its exercise which will follow had been the UK to withdraw from the ECHR (or certainly repeal the HRA). In the principle judgment, Lord Mance cites (approvingly) the Lawyer Common's submission that the court docket should respect 32 ‘the choice made by the establishment competent to make such choices in a democracy'. + +All prison courtroom cases begin in a magistrates' courtroom, and the vast majority will end there. The decision to refer a query to the ECJ will be made by the court of its personal initiative, or at the request of any of the parties earlier than it. Where a question of European regulation is unsure and there is no enchantment from the choice of a court docket, it is required (besides below the doctrine of acte clair ) to refer the question to the ECJ \ No newline at end of file